2017-03-11 BBC + BPAS + MP Diana Johnson pro-abortion biased interviews

Home 

BBC + BPAS (British Pregnancy [ 'P' should be for Pro-abortion ] Advisory Service ) + MP Diana Johnson : pro-abortion biased interviews

BBC News: 2017-03-11: legalisation of abortions in the UK.

Content in this page:

Part1: BPAS representative Clare Murphy ignores question about the 'ending of life' in abortions.

Part2: BBC misleads the public, mentioning that the 'Royal College of Midwives is backing the legalisation of abortions'.

Part3: Labour MP Diana Johnson says that the UK is one of the most punitive regimes in Europe, for keeping in place 1861 laws to protect the lives of pre-born babies. (a lie).

Part4: Labour MP Diana Johnson suggests that countries should follow the steps of Australia and make abortion legal, because she thinks that people like her can decide what "should happen in our society".



PART 1: at 01min:33sec of the main video

BPAS representative Clare Murphy ignores question about the 'ending of life' in abortions.

- she avoids answering question around the fact that an abortion involves 'ending the life of a human being'.

- she mentions that in the XXI century they trust that women can make the rights decisions for their lives. But she doesn't mention that BPAS mainly provides women with information about how to opt in for an abortion. Also most of their material intentionally don't mention information about the pre-born baby (human being) that is killed during the abortion, they mainly refer to the baby as the 'removal of the pregnancy'.  Removing all humanity from the pre-born baby, and hiding the fact that a human being is killed during the abortion.

Our question is: How can we trust that women are making the right decisions based on the biased information that they receive from BPAS and similar organisations around the world, which de-humanise the pre-born baby, hide the risks to the life of the mother and hide the risks for future pregnancies of the woman?




PART 2: at 02min:36sec of the main video

BBC misleads the public, mentioning that the 'Royal College of Midwives is backing the legalisation of abortions'

BBC misleads the public, mentioning that the 'Royal College of Midwives is backing legalisation of abortions'.
The fact is: that just a few people inside of the 'Royal College of Midwives' - who DO NOT represent the voice of the majority of members - abusing of their positions in the organisation are backing the legalisation of abortions.
One of the main persons involved in these wrong doings is 'Cathy Warwick', Chief Executive of Royal College of Midwives, and at the same time Chair of BPAS (British Pregnancy [ or 'P' should be for Pro-abortion ] Advisory Service).
This is morally wrong, and there is a clear conflict of interest.

Sources:
https://www.rcm.org.uk/about/who-we-are/cathy-warwick
https://www.bpas.org/about-our-charity/history/bpas-people/
http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2016/05/as-a-midwife-im-horrified-by-my-union-leaders-support-for-unlimited-abortion/
http://notinourname.co/



PART 3: at 06min:15sec of the main video

Labour MP Diana Johnson says that the UK is one of the most punitive regimes in Europe, for keeping in place 1861 laws to protect the lives of pre-born babies (a lie).

FYI: Ms. Diana Johnson, the year when a law was implemented should NOT matter, as long as that law is there to protect Human life.
According to your mentality: should we start removing laws that prevent things like the 'holocaust' from happening again, maybe because there may be laws related to that topic that are becoming a bit too old?

The fact is: that NO WOMAN in your country has gone to prison for life, for having an abortion. From our research, there seem to be only TWO KNOWN CASES of women that received just a couple of years of sentence, but this has been because they carried out abortions on babies that were in the 32 and 39 week of the pregnancy, which means that they were almost fully developed babies, that could have perfectly lived outside of the womb of the mother.
So, should the law allow and make legal the killing of these babies?.
Should the law allow the killing of babies that are 32 or 39 weeks old, in the womb of their mothers? and what about pre-mature or pre-born babies in the same age? 

In your country, it seems that animals are better protected than humans. In your country, people can be jailed for destroying eggs of wild birds, for disturbing them, or even for destroying their nests.
A report of the European Parliament (section 2.1.2)  on crime against Wildlife in the UK, shows these figures:

In 2005, an amendment to the domestic regulation enforcing the CITES convention in the UK increased the maximum prison sentence for wildlife crimes from 2 years to 5 years. The level of fines is unlimited. According to the 2013/2014 CITES biennial report, 18 criminal prosecution cases took place. These included the following cases which resulted in the indicated sanctions: 

• six months imprisonment for trying to smuggle over 750 kg  of rare and endangered corals and clams from Ho Chi Minh City in Vietnam to the UK;
• fine of GBP 555 for three occasions of fraudulently evading a restriction on the export of ivory;
• one year of imprisonment for smuggling San Salvador rock iguanas to the UK.

The number of prosecutions varied in previous years. There were 4 prosecutions between 2007 and 2008, 21 prosecutions between 2009 and 2010 and 4 prosecutions between 2011 and 2012. Significant cases included the following which resulted in the indicated sanctions:

• a GBP 500 fine for an attempt to sell two ring tailed lemurs on the internet;
• nine months sentence suspended for two years and GBP 3,607 cost to be paid for the illegal importation of bird eggs from the US and Australia and the illegal sale of the eggs;
• twelve months of imprisonment for the attempted smuggling of rhino horns from the UK to China;
• Fine of GBP 600 for the purchase and sale of barn owls; 
• Two years suspended sentence and GBP 1,480 in cost recovery for selling elephant ivory, hippo ivory and sperm whale teeth. 

This means that in your country the law is more punitive with people that destroy wildlife, than with people that end the life of human beings (pre-born children).
We agree on protecting wildlife, this is OK. But it is not right that HUMAN BEINGS receive less protection than animals and wildlife.

In 2006 you supported a ban on "docking of dogs' tails".
You mentioned that: "Having received representations from many different groups and individuals on this issue, I am satisfied that tail docking is cruel, inflicts pain and is largely unnecessary"
On that year; about the cruelty on animals you also mentioned: "Some of the stories we hear too frequently of neglect and outright cruelty cause great public anger and there must be stronger protection for animals and heavier punishment for those guilty of mistreatment".

Don't you think that pre-born babies also fill pain when they are killed during an abortion?
If you think that the docking of dogs' tails is cruel, don't you think that the dismemberment and disembowelment of pre-born babies in the womb of their mothers is also cruel?

On top of that:
Because of the fact that 'ONE African elephant is killed every 15 minutes'; currently, your Labour Party seems to be promoting a ban on the traffic of "ivory" and actively promoting the protection of elephants and rhino.

Did you know that in your own country, an average of 'SIX babies are killed(abortions) every 15 minutes"?

Sources:
http://www.healthcentre.org.uk/abortion/faqs-how-many.html
https://www.spuc.org.uk/news/news-stories/2016/may/509-unborn-babies-killed-every-day-as-abortions-increase-nationwide

http://www.catholicherald.co.uk/news/2017/03/03/mps-to-debate-bill-that-would-decriminalise-abortion/
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2016/578963/IPOL_IDA(2016)578963_EN.pdf

MP backs tail docking ban
http://www.dianajohnson.co.uk/node/356
Hull MP backs crackdown on animal cruelty
http://www.dianajohnson.co.uk/node/371



PART 4: at 07min:36sec of the main video

Labour MP Diana Johnson suggests that countries should follow the steps of Australia and make abortion legal, because she thinks that people like her can decide what "should happen in our society".

It seems that you ignore the atrocities that are happening in countries like Australia, as a consequence of opening more doors to abortion and legalising it.
Example:
In Australia the number of babies left to die after surviving late-term abortions has increased.

The number of babies surviving late-term abortions have increased in Queensland, figures released by Health Minister Cameron Dick have shown.

Calendar year	Terminations with live birth outcome
2005	8
2006	16
2007	20
2008	15
2009	13
2010	17
2011	20
2012	20
2013	23
2014	25
2015	27
Total	204

Visit Source.

The public should not forget the many controversies that you caused in your country around the misuse of public money (expenses).
Reminders:
2009: MPs' expenses: Diana Johnson claims £987 for an architect and repays it two years later,
2010: Questions grow over Labour MP Diana Johnson's expenses


Sources:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/mps-expenses/5346560/MPs-expenses-Diana-Johnson-claims-987-for-an-architect-and-repays-it-two-years-later.html
http://www.libdemvoice.org/diane-johnson-expenses-hull-north-18416.html
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-06-15/babies-of-late-terminations-left-to-die-without-care/7512618



Based in all this information, we think that it is NOT SAFE that people and politicians like you should dictate and decide what "should happen (and what should be legal) in our societies". After all, British politicians with a similar mentality, moral and ethics like yours kept 'slavery' legal for so many years.

From across the Atlantic.
Nice regards.

Free Ecuador.


--------------------------------------------

Related YouTube videos:

Playlist: 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RifyIiNivbo&list=PL3_Sari89Hp5SUdxPuyVzDoXumb6xiJPB


Main Video: 8min8sec Main Video
BBC + BPAS (British Pregnancy [ 'P' should be for Pro-abortion ] Advisory Service ) + Mp Diana Johnson pro-abortion biased interviews
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RifyIiNivbo 



Extracts from the main video:

Part1: 33 seconds (extract from main video)
BPAS representative Clare Murphy ignores question about the 'ending of life' in abortions.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ASRv8oXSySQ

Part2: 15 seconds (extract from main video)
BBC misleads the public, mentioning that the 'Royal College of Midwives is backing the legalisation of abortions'.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4uJyKmlzuYI

Part3: 8 seconds (extract from main video)
Labour MP Diana Johnson says that the UK is one of the most punitive regimes in Europe, for keeping in place 1861 laws to protect the lives of pre-born babies. (a lie).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZiT0IED37ro

Part4: 25 seconds (extract from main video)
Labour MP Diana Johnson suggests that countries should follow the steps of Australia and make abortion legal, because she thinks that people like her can decide what "should happen in our society".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w6aGjMeysZA

The evil: Qatar targets Ecuador: the islamisation of Latin America

The evil: Qatar targets Ecuador: the islamisation of Latin America
Versión en Español  Home Social:       

Dec. 13 2014, NY.

The ignorance of of Rafael Correa's government about the risks of doing business with muslim countries is one of the main reasons why Ecuador is opening doors to countries like Qatar. Another reason is the blind hate to the USA, and the silly idea that "the enemies of my enemies are my friends". We have to be alert to the tentacles of the USA and their foreign policies in Latin America, but doing businesses with muslim countries will not do any good to Latin America, they are worst that the USA.

Naive Correa visited Qatar in October 2014, where Qataris started delivering the Trojan Horse (Islamisation through business links) that they prepared for Ecuador.
The ignorance of muslim mentality and culture is so incredible in Correa's government, that as a sign of respect Correa showed the soles of his shoes to the Qataris during the meeting that he attended.

Source: thepeninsulaqatar.com

Qataris have everything planned, ensuring that all channels are open to achieve their goals; so they convinced Ecuador to sign an Open Sky Air Transport Agreement.

Source: Qatar civil aviation authority

A couple of days ago, Ecuador and Qatar signed an agreement, allowing Qatar to invest around 5000 million USD in Ecuador.

Video (Spanish only, 4min): Source (Spanish only)
In the video: Ecuadorian businessmen seem to have no clue about all the implications of signing a MOA agreement with Qatar, it's like signing a contract with the Devil.
Like in the Ecuadorain legend of Cantuña, the silly government of Rafael Correa is putting Ecuador on a golden plate and offering it to the Qataris.

Similar situation, like when Ecuador signed business agreements with Iran, which Iran used for moving to Ecuador's Central Bank huge amounts of money, possibly linked with money laundering and terrorism. (Google it!)
One of many sources: www.newsmax.com

Qatar and other muslim countries have a well planned strategy to spread islam to the rest of the world, and one of the main tools is business and investments in the targeted countries.

On the other side, Qatar is supporting terrorist groups like Hamas and ISIL, something that has been publicly exposed by many international newspapers and even by the German Development Minister Gerd Mueller.

Photos:
Left: Doha - Qatari Emir Hamad bin Khalifa Al Thani, welcoming Khaled Meshal, leader of terorist group Hamas.
Right: Atrocities of ISIL.
Sources:
1.- Qatar runs covert desert training camp for Syrian rebels
2.- Qatar allows money to flow to Islamic State, other jihad terrorists
3.- Qatar allows money to flow to ISIS, other terrorists
4.- German minister accuses Qatar of funding Islamic State fighters

Qatar and the islamisation of Europe:

France:
Source: http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org

Qatar said its investment was intended to support small businesses in disadvantaged Muslim neighborhoods. But as Qatar, like Saudi Arabia, subscribes to the ultra-conservative Wahhabi sect of Islam, critics say the emirate's real objective is to peddle its religious ideology among Muslims in France and other parts of Europe.

Shortly before Qatar announced its plans to invest in France, Qatari Emir Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa al-Thani, who has long cultivated an image as a pro-Western reformist and modernizer, vowed to "spare no effort" to spread the fundamentalist teachings of Wahhabi Islam across "the whole world."

The promotion of Islamic extremist ideologies -- particularly Wahhabism, which not only discourages Muslim integration in the West, but actively encourages jihad against non-Muslims -- threatens to further radicalize Muslim immigrants in France.

England:
Qatar has a very close relationship with England and the monarchy in this country. This allowed them to invest huge amounts of money in London, their businesses include: the Shard, Harrods, 6.67% of Barclays (Bank), the Olympic Village, Chelsea Barracks (properties), 26% of Sanbury's (one of the biggest supermarket in England), One Hide Park (properties), 20% Camdem Market, 20% of London Stock Exchange, etc, etc, etc.
The Shard: building administrated under 'Sharia Law', the tallest building in Europe, that has become the new icon in London, replacing traditional British icons like Buckingham Palace and St Paul Cathedral. 
Source:  http://www.londonlovesbusiness.com

The bad: Suspicious: Purple/Dark tomato debuts as ‘Indigo Rose’

Scientists playing with nature?

According to the scientists this new variety has not been the product of genetic manipulations.
They say that is just the result of mixing several varieties of the product, one of them taken from our Galapagos Islands.

Source: http://extension.oregonstate.edu/gardening/purple-tomato-debuts-%E2%80%98indigo-rose%E2%80%99

The evil: shocking. muslims joking about terrorist attacks, in our faces...

This film has been broadcasted in some TV stations in England. Muslims joking about terrorist attacks, in our faces...
They have no respect for the lives of civilian targets, lost in the terrorist attacks in London.

Evil muslim extremists.

The bad: Philips Sonicare: subliminal messages encouraging homosexuality

On Wed Oct 2. 2013 Philips Sonicare showed an ad with subliminal messages encouraging homosexuality in some newspaper in England.

The ad used the following image:

This is no surprise, as in the annual report for 2012, Philips mentions: "As part of our efforts to reach out to under-represented groups within Philips, we have set up popular networks for female employees and for gay and lesbian employees."

For sure these employees are doing everything, so that they promote more and more homosexuality in the new ads from Philips.

Crazy and evil!

The bad: Assange expenses covered with money from Ecuador?

Source: http://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/free-assange-so-he-can-treat-lung-infection-8367549.html

Ms Alban, Ecuador’s ambassador to Britain, said: “Mr Assange, as every-one knows, is in a confined space. Not only does the embassy have few windows but the city is also dark at this time — we have very little daylight in London.” She added that he is receiving medical help within the embassy and Ecuador was covering the costs.

Evil: Islam: Aisha and Mohammed: pedophilia?

Español Home Social:       

Make your own conclusions!!!
You are not forced to believe what we expose in this article, take this information and do your own research!


Here the facts:

The scene and the characters: Aisha and Mohammed
- When Aisha was 6 years old, she was given as a wife to Mohammed (marriage ceremony)
- 3 years later, when Aisha was 9 years old, still a small girl enjoying her childhood, playing with her friends. In the twinkle of an eye, is forced to have sex with Mohammed, a man 52 years old. (consummation of marriage, sex, intercourse)


Official muslim sources for this event (Hadiths and others):

"Umm Ruman (my mother) came to me and I was at that time on a swing along with my playmates. She called me loudly and I went to her and I did not know what she had wanted of me. She too hold of my hand and took me to the door, and I was saying: Ha, ha (as if I was gasping), until the agitation of my heart was over. She took me to a house, where had gathered the women of the Ansar. They all blessed me and wished me good luck and said: May you have shared in good. She (my mother) entrusted me to them. They washed my head and embellished me and nothing frightened me. Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) came there in the morning, and I was entrusted to him" Ref: Tabari Hadith, 9. 131


Summary:
A 52 years old man (Mohammed - the prophet of Islam) having sex with a 9 years old child (Aisha).


Definition of pedophilia:
The act or fantasy on the part of an adult of engaging in sexual activity with a child or children
Source: http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Pedofilia


Our conclusion: 
Clearly this event described in muslim literature is an act of pedophilia. 

See the facts and make your own conclusion!